• E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INVENTIONS IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal
(By Aryavart International University, India)

Paper Details

Analysis of Various Nozzle Designs to Improve Rocket Engine Performance

Vidyut C Murali

The International School Bangalore (TISB)

93 - 107 Vol. 11, Issue 1, Jan-Dec, 2025
Receiving Date: 2025-05-31;    Acceptance Date: 2025-08-29;    Publication Date: 2025-10-14
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijiest.v11i01.012

Abstract

This paper suggests a nozzle geometry that has the greatest potential to improve rocket engine parameters, such as thrust and efficiency, beyond their current status. Increasing these would increase the payload mass that can be sent into space and help create a viable Single-Stage-to-Orbit (SSTO) platform. Various performance metrics and physical phenomena regarding rocket science, particularly rocket engines, are explained. Next, the paper discusses various nozzle geometries and discuss their performance benefits and drawbacks. This is followed by an analysis of the risk and the payoff factors of each of the nozzle geometries proposed and a recommendation on which shows the most promise. This paper has found that dual bell and aerospike nozzles have acceptable risk-to-payoff ratios and the former should be developed and integrated into existing platforms until the technology for the latter reaches its maturity. One limitation of the discussion presented is that it is limited to nozzle geometries that have already been discussed, hence no novel geometries can be proposed by this paper.

Keywords: aerospike nozzle; two step nozzle; expansion deflection nozzle; dual bell nozzle; altitude compensation; overexpansion; underexpansion

    References

  1. Aircraft Technology. (2018, March 28). Nozzle design | Konstantinos Makris aviation oriented web site. https://www.k-makris.gr/nozzle-design/
  2. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stark R, German Aerospace Center. (n.d.). Flow separation in rocket nozzles – an overview.
  3. Berton, J. J., & National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1991, August). Divergence thrust loss calculations for convergent-divergent nozzles: Extensions to the classical case. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4257.5446
  4. Cardenas, I. R., Laín, S., & Lopez, O. D. (2025). A review of aerospike nozzles: Current trends in aerospace applications. Aerospace, 12(6), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060519
  5. Experimental analysis of a linear expansion-deflection nozzle at highly overexpanded conditions. (2014). https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/imarusic/proceedings/19/25.pdf
  6. Furfaro, E. (2025, February 19). How long does it take to get to the Moon... Mars... Jupiter? We asked a NASA expert: Episode 51. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/smd/how-long-does-it-take-to-get-to-the-moon-mars-jupiter-we-asked-a-nasa-expert-episode-51/
  7. Hagemann, G., Immich, H., Nguyen, T. V., & Dumnov, G. E. (1998). Advanced rocket nozzles. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 14(5), 620–634.
  8. Hagemann, G., Terhardt, M., Haeseler, D., & Frey, M. (2002). Experimental and analytical design verification of the dual-bell concept. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 18(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5905
  9. Horn, M., & Fisher, S., Rocketdyne Div., Rockwell International. (n.d.). Dual-bell altitude compensating nozzles. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940018584/downloads/19940018584.pdf
  10. MIT. (n.d.). *Lecture P5: Rocket Performance — General comments. Prof. Manuel Martinez-Sanchez, Massachusetts Institute of Technology*. https://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/SPRING/propulsion/Mud/P5mud.html
  11. NASA Glenn Research Center. (2023, November 21). Ideal rocket equation. Glenn Research Center | NASA. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/ideal-rocket-equation/
  12. Östlund, J. (2004). Supersonic flow separation with application to rocket engine nozzles [Master's thesis, Royal Institute of Technology]. DIVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:9646/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  13. Rocket nozzles: 75 years of research and development. (2021). Sādhanā – Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 46, 76. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/sadh/046/0076
  14. Shyne, R. J., & Lewis Research Center. (1988, August). Analysis and optimization of truncated scarf nozzles subject to external flow conditions. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19880020362/downloads/19880020362.pdf
  15. Singh, J., Zerpa, L. E., Partington, B., & Gamboa, J. (2019). Effect of nozzle geometry on critical-subcritical flow transitions. Heliyon, 5(2), e01273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01273
  16. Sutton, G. P., & Biblarz, O. (2001). Rocket propulsion elements (7th ed.). Wiley India Pvt. Ltd. https://soaneemrana.org/onewebmedia/Rocket%20Propulsion%20Elements%20by%20George%20P.%20Sutton1.pdf
  17. Taylor, N. V., & Hempsell, Macfarlane, Osborne. (2008). Experimental investigation of the evacuation effect in expansion deflection nozzles. Acta Astronautica, 66(3–4). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576509003889
  18. Taylor, N., Steelant, J., & Bond, R. (2011, July 31). Experimental comparison of dual bell and expansion deflection nozzles. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-5688
  19. Testing nozzle expansion ratio with R-Candy – Nozzle CAD files. (2020, June). Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/rocketry/comments/ew3lnp/testing_nozzle_expansion_ratio_with_rcandy_nozzle/
  20. The aerospike nozzle - Rocketschnozzles. (n.d.). http://rocketschnozzles.weebly.com/the-aerospike-nozzle.html
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Inventions in Engineering & Science Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.