• E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2020

    5.051

    Impact Factor 2021

    5.610

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2020

    5.051

    Impact Factor 2021

    5.610

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2020

    5.051

    Impact Factor 2021

    5.610

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INVENTIONS IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal
(By Aryavart International University, India)

Paper Details

LEVERAGING DIGITAL PROCESS MANAGEMENT FOR ATTAINING A TACTICAL EDGE IN MEETING THE COMPLIANCE OF BENCHMARKED QUALITY 4.0

Chandan Bansal

Shivaji College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

111 - 116 Vol. 3, Jan-Dec, 2017
Receiving Date: 2017-09-11;    Acceptance Date: 2017-10-21;    Publication Date: 2017-11-02
Download PDF

Abstract

This study delves into the intersection of Quality 4.0 and green business process management (GBPM) as potent strategies for enhancing competitive advantage within organizations. Quality 4.0, a novel quality management approach rooted in Industry 4.0 technologies and digitalization, is explored alongside the principles of GBPM, which are recognized as pivotal in maintaining production efficiency and sustainability. Through empirical analysis conducted in the food manufacturing industry of Dubai, UAE, this study investigates the perceived impact of Quality 4.0 and GBPM on competitive advantage. Data from 216 respondents across 66 food manufacturing companies were collected and analyzed, employing rigorous statistical methods to assess the hypothesized model and mediating effect of Quality 4.0. The findings underscore the significant influence of GBPM on competitive advantage, mediated by Quality 4.0. These insights offer valuable knowledge for manufacturers, industrialists, and researchers, highlighting the potential benefits of implementing Quality 4.0, such as enhanced quality, efficiency, innovation, decision-making, and market differentiation.

Keywords: green business process management (GBPM); Quality 4.0; digital process management

    References

  1. N. Opitz, H. Krüp, and L. M. Kolbe, “Green Business Process Management -- A Definition and Research Framework,” in 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2014, pp. 3808–3817. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.473.
  2. L. Lakhal, “Impact of quality on competitive advantage and organizational performance,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 637–645, 2009, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602601.
  3. M. E. Porter, “Technology and competitive advantage (chapter 5 in competitive advantage book),” J. Bus. Strategy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 60–78, 1985.
  4. T. K. Eltayeb and S. Zailani, “Investigation on the drivers of green purchasing towards environmental sustainability in the Malaysian manufacturing sector,” Int. J. Procure. Manag., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 316–337, 2010, doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2010.033448.
  5. J. Barney, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” J. Manage., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 1991, doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
  6. M. Munizu, “The Impact of Total Quality Management Practices towards Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance: Case of Fishery Industry in South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia,” 2013.
  7. K. Hoesch-Klohe, A. Ghose, and L.-S. Le, “Towards Green Business Process Management,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, 2010, pp. 386–393. doi: 10.1109/SCC.2010.21.
  8. A. P. Sussan and W. C. Johnson, “Strategic capabilities of business process: Looking for competitive advantage,” Compet. Rev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 46–52, 2003, doi: 10.1108/eb046458.
  9. T. Wagner, C. Herrmann, and S. Thiede, “Industry 4.0 Impacts on Lean Production Systems,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 63, pp. 125–131, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.041.
  10. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, and B. J. Babin, Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed. Prentice Hall, 2010.
Back