• E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INVENTIONS IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal
(By Aryavart International University, India)

Paper Details

A Comparative Usability Study in Designing Institute Interfaces for the Elderly

Dhairya Kulnath Kakkar

Lancer's Convent School, Paschim Vihar, Rohini

8 - 12 Vol. 10, Issue 1, Jan-Dec, 2024
Receiving Date: 2024-01-03;    Acceptance Date: 2024-02-22;    Publication Date: 2024-03-06
Download PDF

Abstract

As the global elderly population continues to rise, ensuring digital inclusion for older adults has become a critical aspect of user interface (UI) design. Older individuals often face unique challenges when interacting with technology due to age-related cognitive, sensory, and motor limitations. These challenges necessitate specialized interface designs that prioritize intuitiveness, clarity, and accessibility. This research paper presents a comprehensive comparative usability study of five distinct UI designs tailored for elderly users: tag-based web interface, hierarchical web interface, mobile application, nostalgic tangible user interface (TUI), and a kiosk interface with seated and non-seated options.

    References

  1. Barros, A. C., Leitão, R., & Ribeiro, J. (2013). Design and evaluation of a mobile user interface for older adults: Navigation, interaction and visual design recommendations. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 369– 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.041
  2. Bong, W. K., Bergland, A., & Chen, W. (2019). Technology acceptance and usability of smart home monitoring systems among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 129, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.013
  3. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 213–218). https://doi.org/10.1145/57167.57203
  4. Chung, H., & Park, W. (2021). Enhancing the usability of self-service kiosks for older adults: A design study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07445. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.07445
  5. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 249–256). https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
  6. Nurgalieva, L., Baez, M., & Casati, F. (2017). Design and evaluation of mobile health applications: A review of the literature. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06317. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.06317
  7. Pak, R., Price, M. M., & Thatcher, J. (2009). Age-sensitive design of online health information: Comparative usability study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e45. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1220
  8. Wang, C. M., Tseng, S. M., & Huang, C. S. (2020). Design of an interactive nostalgic amusement device for the elderly based on their motivations and game elements. Healthcare, 8(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020179
  9. Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Dong, W., & Liu, Q. (2022). Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: A scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22, 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911- 022-02064-5
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Inventions in Engineering & Science Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.