• E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INVENTIONS IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal
(By Aryavart International University, India)

Paper Details

Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Users Using Deep Learning Models

Rasha Majid Hassoon

Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Users Using Deep Learning Models

64 - 71 Vol. 12, Issue 1, Jan-Dec, 2026
Receiving Date: 2026-01-11;    Acceptance Date: 2026-02-15;    Publication Date: 2026-03-09
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijiest.v12i01.008

Abstract

This research suggests a robust and systematic way for Arabic Sentiment Analysis using a vast dataset of 66,666 text reviews. One of the main advantages of this study is that the dataset was perfectly balanced (33,333 positive samples and 33,333 negative samples). In machine learning, this 50/50 split is important because it eliminates class bias and enables the predictive model to treat both sentiment classes equally. As shown in the values of the metrics — overall accuracy, weighted precision, weighted recall, and F1 score — there is great similarity among them, indicating a stable and reliable assessment of the model's real potential throughout the Arabic dataset. Based on data profile, the average word count per review is 42.37 words, which is sufficient for classification of text using linguistic context.

Keywords: Sentiment Analysis; Arabic Natural Language Processing (NLP); TF-IDF; LinearSVC; Machine Learning; Twitter Data.

    References

  1. Abdulla, N., Ahmed, N., Shehab, M., & Al-Ayyoub, M. (2013). Arabic sentiment analysis: Lexicon-based and corpusbased. 2013 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), 1–6.
  2. Al-Azani, S., & El-Alfy, E. S. M. (2017). Sentiment analysis of Arabic tweets: A comparative study. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 1–6.
  3. Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python. O'Reilly Media. https://www.nltk.org/
  4. Duwairi, R. M., & El-Orfali, I. (2014). A study of the effects of preprocessing strategies on Arabic sentiment analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(16), 1–8.
  5. Macedoniale0. (2020). Arabic sentiment analysis — 66k reviews [Dataset]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/macedoniale0/arabic-sentiment-analysis-66k-reviews
  6. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. https://scikit-learn.org/
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Inventions in Engineering & Science Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.